Social responsibility of clean energy supply chains  

There is a comparison between the fossil fuel divestment movement that big banks’ are focused on and the issue of ethical mining and mineral sourcing. Continued support and dependence upon unethical mining result in grave consequences for companies involved. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a global firm that focuses on sustainable development. They published a report called Green Conflict Minerals: The fuels of conflict in the transition to a low-carbon economy. It dives into the reality of the possible consequences for poorly-managed extraction of minerals for clean energy equipment.
 

Conflicting priorities within the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals

In addition, there’s conflicting priorities within the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals that must be properly balanced. Clare Church, the IISD research officer says, “This question is extremely important, especially considering the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs,” Church explained. “As we move to attain the aims set out by SDGs 7 and 13 – for clean water and climate action respectively – it is essential we do so without jeopardizing SDG 16 – for peace, justice, and strong institutions. Like current movements supporting fossil fuels divestment, there is absolutely room for a movement to divest away from businesses and organizations that support regional fragility, conflict, and violence”. Church continued, “And there is evidence to support this: demand is coming from both consumers and governments, as well as industry to shift to more responsible supply chains, with an increasing number of companies making efforts to dub their product ‘conflict-free. And soon, many businesses will have to start making these efforts anyway. The upcoming EU Conflict Mineral Regulation will directly apply to almost 1,000 importers and 500 smelters and refiners of 3TG – whether they are based in the EU or not. Although the identified “green conflict minerals” in our report are not covered by the Regulation, this is a massive first step towards making our mineral supply chains more responsible on an international level.”
 

Poorly-managed supply chains mentality​​​​​​​ 

International large companies such as Apple and Google proactively move away from relying on the traditional and poorly-managed supply chains mentality. The old way depends less on social responsibility and only highlight on maximizing profit. An instance of this would be Apple launching $300 million China Clean Energy Fund to partner with its suppliers to increase their use of renewables energy. Church states, “what we need are supply chain best practices that foster peace and sustainability in mineral-rich developing states. Then the mineral wealth will truly benefit the country’s environment and people.”“These demands – from governments, consumers, and industry – are all part of this broader movement to divest from practices that foster regional fragility. The foundations are in place, but there is still a lot of work to be done.”

Move into the future with solar with the help of HahaSmart., Try our price checker tool and see how affordable solar really is. We can also help find qualified solar installers who can help save you money on the cost of going solar. Don't forget to visit our solar blog section for more handy guides and articles, about going solar.